Hotline0937 763 762 VIEN Book a consultation

KHC restructures its four deployment packages by event scale

The four tiers are separated by event scale, peak concurrency and level of operational commitment, not by feature count.

KHC newsSep 24, 20263 min read
KHC restructures its four deployment packages by event scale

KHC has restructured its product tiers into four deployment packages. The dividing principle is not a feature count but the three factors that decide how hard a project actually is: event scale, peak concurrency, and the level of operational commitment the organisation needs.

An empty stadium before the gates open
One core platform underneath; what changes is the operations layer and the service level attached.

Why not divide by features

Dividing by features forces a customer to guess what they need before they understand their own problem. It also produces the familiar outcome where a small organisation buys a high tier for one feature, or a large event buys a low tier and then fails in the first minute of the on-sale.

All four KHC tiers share one core platform: a ticketing webapp, dynamic QR tickets, gate check-in with offline readiness, and sales reporting. What differs is the operations layer, the defence layer and the committed service level.

The four tiers and the lines between them

PackageApplies toWhat separates it
Single eventOne or a few days, moderate trafficFast deployment, organiser runs the event day
Season and seriesMany fixtures, many on-sale wavesRepeatable operations and an accumulating data layer
Large scale with commitmentHigh peak traffic, service-level needsDefence layer, load testing, written commitment
Purpose-built modelCases the three tiers do not describeSurvey first, then a revenue model of its own

The real line between the second and third tiers is peak concurrency, not total tickets. Selling five thousand tickets over three days and five thousand in fifteen minutes are different engineering problems.

A working meeting in a room overlooking the pitch
Every organisation is surveyed first, and only then receives a figure of its own.

Five questions that settle the tier

Is this one event or a whole cycle. What is the expected peak concurrency. Is there a seat map, and is seat selection required. Are membership, merchandise and food and beverage required. And finally, who carries the event day.

Those five are usually enough to settle the tier in one working session, and they also frame what the KHC team prepares for the survey.

On pricing

KHC does not publish prices for the four packages. Audience size, number of events in a cycle, peak concurrency and current ticketing practice differ from one organisation to the next, so each customer is surveyed first and then receives a figure of their own with a scope document.

This is slower than a printed price list, but it avoids the common outcome of a template quote followed by change orders once real delivery starts.

Frequently asked questions

Can a lower tier be upgraded later

Yes, because all four share the same core platform. Upgrading mainly adds the operations layer, the defence layer and the service level rather than replacing the system.

Who is the purpose-built package for

For cases the three tiers do not describe: an organisation that owns a large community but runs no events, a manufacturer seeking access to an existing community, or a federation needing one shared model across member organisations.

What does the survey cover

A review of current ticketing, membership care, existing sponsorship packages and where the data sits today. It usually takes one working session on site.

Conclusion

Tiering by scale and commitment lets both sides speak the same language from the first meeting. To find out which tier fits, book a survey of where you stand today.

See also the four KHC deployment packages.

KHC packagesticketing platformservice levelsurveytailored quote
Interested in the KHC platform?

Leave your details and KHC will be in touch.

Book a consultation